|
Joseph Priestley (13 March 1733 (old style) – 8 February 1804) was a British natural philosopher, political theorist, clergyman, theologian, and educator. He was one of the most influential Dissenters of the late 18th-century. A member of marginalized religious groups throughout his life and a proponent of what was called "rational Dissent," Priestley advocated religious toleration (challenging even William Blackstone), helped Theophilus Lindsey found the Unitarian church and promoted the repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts in the 1780s. As the foremost British expounder of providentialism, he argued for extensive civil rights, believing that individuals could bring about progress and eventually the Millennium.〔Tapper, 314.〕 Priestley's religious beliefs were integral to his metaphysics as well as his politics and he was the first philosopher to "attempt to combine theism, materialism, and determinism," a project that has been called "audacious and original."〔 ==Defender of Dissenters and political philosopher== Priestley claimed throughout his life that politics did not interest him and that he did not participate in it. What appeared to others as political arguments were for Priestley always, at their root, religious arguments. Many of what we would call Priestley's political writings were aimed at supporting the repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts, a political issue that had its foundation in religion.〔Schofield, need page number.〕 Between 1660 and 1665, Parliament passed a series of laws that restricted the rights of dissenters: they could not hold political office, teach school, serve in the military or attend Oxford and Cambridge unless they ascribed to the thirty-nine Articles of the Church of England. In 1689, a Toleration Act was passed that restored some of these rights, if dissenters subscribed to 36 of the 39 articles (Catholics and Unitarians were excluded), but not all Dissenters were willing to accept this compromise and many refused to conform. Throughout the 18th century Dissenters were persecuted and the laws against them were erratically enforced. Dissenters continually petitioned Parliament to repeal the Test and Corporation Acts, claiming that the laws made them second-class citizens. The situation worsened in 1753 after the passage of Lord Hardwicke's Marriage Act which stipulated that all marriages must be performed by Anglican ministers; some refused to perform Dissenting weddings at all.〔Schofield, Vol. 1, 202–5〕 Priestley's friends urged him to publish a work on the injustices borne by Dissenters, a topic to which he had already alluded in his ''Essay on a Course of Liberal Education for Civil and Active Life'' (1765).〔Priestley, Joseph. ''An essay on a course of liberal education for civil and active life''. London: Printed for C. Henderson under the Royal Exchange; T. Becket and De Hondt in the Strand; and by J. Johnson and Davenport, in Pater-Noster-Row, 1765.〕 The result was Priestley's ''Essay on the First Principles of Government'',〔Priestley, Joseph. ''An essay on the first principles of government; and on the nature of political, civil, and religious liberty''. Need publication information for first edition.〕 which Priestley's major modern biographer calls his "most systematic political work," in 1768.〔Schofield, Vol. 1, 206.〕 The book went through three English editions and was translated into Dutch. Jeremy Bentham credited it with inspiring his "greatest happiness principle."〔For an analysis of Bentham's statements on this issue, see Schofield, Vol. 1, 207–8.〕 The ''Essay on Government'' is not strictly utilitarian, however; like all of Priestley's works, it is infused with the belief that society is progressing towards perfection. Although much of the text rearticulates John Locke's arguments from his ''Two Treatises on Government'' (1689), it also makes a useful distinction between political and civil rights and argues for protection of extensive civil rights.〔Garrett, 17; Tapper, 315.〕 He distinguishes between a private and a public sphere of governmental control; education and religion, in particular, he maintains, are matters of private conscience and should not be administered by the state. As Kramnick states, "Priestley's fundamental maxim of politics was the need to limit state interference on individual liberty."〔Kramnick, 18.〕 For early liberals like Priestley and Jefferson, the "defining feature of liberal politics" was its emphasis on the separation of church and state.〔Schofield, Vol. 1, 209–10; Jackson, 100–1; Uglow, 169; Kramnick, 20.〕 In a statement that articulates key elements of early liberalism and anticipates utilitarian arguments, Priestley wrote:
Priestley acknowledged that revolution was necessary at times but believed that Britain had already had its only necessary revolution in 1688, although his later writings would suggest otherwise. Priestley's later radicalism emerged from his belief that the British government was infringing upon individual freedom.〔Tapper, 315.〕 Priestley would repeatedly return to these themes throughout his career, particularly when defending the rights of Dissenters.〔Gibbs, 39–43.〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Joseph Priestley and Dissent」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|